Judge and Commissioners, I’m using my three minutes to ask ten questions that this court has avoided for months. These are not optional. These are the questions any responsible government would answer before entertaining a landfill of this scale.
First: What independent, third‑party engineering or environmental review—not paid for or influenced by the developer—has the county obtained to verify this landfill is even safe? If the answer is “none,” the public deserves to hear that out loud.
Second: Where is the full financial analysis comparing the supposed benefits to the very real costs—road destruction, emergency response, environmental monitoring, long‑term liability, and the loss of future development? If no such analysis exists, why is this project even being discussed?
Third: If this landfill leaks, fails, or the company collapses—as similar companies have—what is Pike County’s financial exposure? Who pays for cleanup, lawsuits, and decades of monitoring? The people deserve a direct answer, not silence.
Fourth: Why were negotiations and discussions with the developer conducted without full transparency, public hearings, or timely access to documents? This is public land, public risk, and public money.
Fifth: Has this court conducted a full review of the track record of every company and individual involved—violations, lawsuits, bankruptcies, failed projects? If not, that is negligence.
Sixth: What is the projected daily truck volume, and what is the plan to protect our roads, our bridges, our school bus routes, and our emergency response times? Vague assurances are not a plan.
Seventh: How many years until this landfill reaches capacity, and what prevents Pike County from becoming a regional dumping ground for out‑of‑state waste? Because that is the pattern everywhere these facilities are built.
Eighth: What protections exist to prevent leachate spills, groundwater contamination, and dust‑blow events—and who is financially responsible when—not if—those failures occur?
Ninth: Why has this court not pursued modern alternatives—rail‑based waste transport, MSW‑to‑cement systems, or other proven technologies that reduce landfill dependency and create jobs? Why is the only option on the table the one with the highest risk and the lowest return?
Tenth: Will each commissioner commit, on the record, to voting against any host agreement until independent studies, public hearings, and full transparency are completed? The public deserves to know where each of you stands.
Judge and Commissioners, these are basic due‑diligence questions. The fact that they remain unanswered is unacceptable. Pike County will not accept secrecy, shortcuts, or blind trust when the stakes are this high.
I am formally requesting written answers to all ten questions. The people of this county are watching, and silence will be taken as an answer.
Direct‑Response Version
Judge and Commissioners, I’m using my three minutes to ask ten questions that require immediate, on‑the‑record answers. These are not rhetorical. These are yes‑or‑no, fact‑based questions, and the public deserves to hear your responses tonight.
First: Has this county obtained any independent, third‑party engineering or environmental review—paid for by the county, not the developer? Yes or no?
Second: Does a full financial analysis exist comparing the claimed benefits to the long‑term costs—road damage, emergency response, environmental monitoring, and liability? If it exists, where is it? If it doesn’t, why not?
Third: If this landfill leaks, fails, or the company goes bankrupt, who pays? Is Pike County financially responsible—yes or no?
Fourth: Were negotiations or discussions with the developer conducted without full public transparency and without timely public access to documents? Yes or no?
Fifth: Has this court reviewed the complete track record of every company and individual involved—violations, lawsuits, bankruptcies, failed projects? If so, produce it. If not, why hasn’t it been done?
Sixth: What is the projected daily truck volume, and has this court approved a plan to protect our roads, bridges, school bus routes, and emergency response times? Yes or no?
Seventh: Can you guarantee that Pike County will not become a regional dumping ground for out‑of‑state waste? If you cannot guarantee it, say so plainly.
Eighth: What protections are in place to prevent leachate spills, groundwater contamination, and dust‑blow events—and who is financially responsible when they occur? Name the responsible party.
Ninth: Has this court evaluated modern alternatives—rail‑based waste transport, MSW‑to‑cement systems, or other proven technologies? If not, why is the riskiest option the only one being pushed?
Tenth: Will each commissioner commit, right now, on the record, to voting against any host agreement until independent studies, public hearings, and full transparency are completed? Yes or no?
Judge and Commissioners, these are straightforward questions. The people of Pike County expect answers—not later, not in private, not after a vote—but right now. Silence, deflection, or “we’ll get back to you” is not acceptable when the health, safety, and future of this county are on the line.
I am formally requesting that each of you respond to these questions publicly and in writing. The community is watching, and your answers—or your refusal to answer—will speak for themselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment